The Day in the Life of a Publisher

Being a publisher is a glamorous job. You wield the power to bring tears to the strong. You have the power to give the weak a reason for moving forward.

As Mari Adkins likes to say: “I like it when I make them cry.”

Okay, I’m being facetious.

I’m often asked what it’s like being a ‘big shot’ publisher/editor. I thought I’d share with you a snapshot of a day in the life of a small press guy.

9am–Read emails. Overnight finds twenty-three new emails in my box. Three of them are queries…

“I know your guidelines say your word limit is a firm 5,000 words, but would you consider 5,023 words? I simply cannot cut twenty-three more words without ruining the integrity of my work.”

“I have a 140,000 word high fantasy novel that I feel would be perfect for Apex. Would you like to see it? I know your (sic) closed to novel subs, but we met at Context and you seemed interested…”

“What do you define as dark SF? Would a story about an elf meeting a bisexual vampire in space count?”

Five more are spam. Apparently I’ve been added to a couple of spam lists for some self-pubbers. There’s another from a “PR firm” that mail blasts millions of accounts for the low, low price of $1,499.

While reading email, I get a phone call. My phone sings the theme to Lost in Space.

“Hello, this is Jason Sizemore.”

“Who is this!?”

“Jason Sizemore.”

“Who?”

“Jason SIZEMORE.”

“Is this Apex Publications?”

“Yes.”

“Is this the editor-in-chief?”

“Yes.”

“Jason Sizemore, right?”

Pause. “Yes.”

“I’m a retired cop from New Jersey. I’ve written a book about the spiritual journal of a crack whore who lives in the slums of New York. She meets a nice priest who helps her find Christ. They have an affair and he’s kicked out of the Church–”

“Sir, wait.”

“…they raise three orphans–”

“Sir, we’re not open to novel submissions.”

“This isn’t a novel. It’s a true story.”

Frown. “We’re not accepting any new books.”

“Says here in this book I got at the used bookstore that you’re accepting book pitches.”

“Sorry, you should check our website. We’re not accepting any new books.”

“The book I wrote is titled A Crack in Heaven. The Archbishop–”

“No! I am not interested in your book.”

“Perhaps you can suggest a publisher? Are you friends with anybody who might help out?”

“No!” Twitch.

“Asshole. You sound like a fucking dumb hick hillbilly.” Click.

After he hangs up on me, I go back to my email. Is is now 9:30am. There are two new messages. One is spam. The other is from a writer whose story I rejected yesterday. I open the email from the writer.

“Dear Mr. Sizemore,

Let me just say “Your Loss.” My stories have been published professionally and the story you just rejected has been bought by a better publisher.

Good luck with you7r (sic) fanzine. Asshole.”

I sigh, forward the email to my slush master and put the guy on the black list.

Oh, the phone is ringing again…I decide to forward the rest of my calls and email to somebody like Maurice Broaddus for the rest of the day…

Maybe the job’s not so glamorous, but the evil aspect can be quite fun.


Let the Right One In movie review (original… not the Hollywood remake)

As a horror fan, I’ve been reading issues of Rue Morgue and Fangoria whenever I remember to buy them at my local Barnes & Noble. Both do a great job covering several aspects of the horror field (those being film, fiction, gaming, special effects, and music) and invariably they lead me to interesting horror films that I might not have otherwise heard about through my daily perusing of the Entertainment Weekly pop blog.

For sometime, I’d been hearing about this Swedish film called Let the Right One In. Both magazines proclaimed it to be one of the best vampire movies ever made. Granted, to earn this honor from me would be simple. I can’t say I’ve seen many vampire movies that moved me in any way (no, I’ve not seen Nosferatu). Still, Let the Right One In had better be damn good or my trust in Rue Morgue and Fangoria was going to be permanently dumped in the bin.

The movie is fantastic.

A bullied twelve-year-old boy named Oskar is living in Blackeberg (a suburb of Stockholm) where he stumbles into an unlikely friendship with a mysterious young girl named Eli. Eli, it turns out, has moved in next door with an older man named Håkan. Oskar lives a lonely life with his mother and over time he and Eli form a bond that is both moving and surreal.

The film does something that few horror movies succeed at doing. You care about what is going to happen to Eli and Oskar. Eli, in a sense is a monster and does some horrific things in the movie, but the viewer senses there is more here than just normal vampiric violence. You recognize that these kids are awkward social beings on the verge of adolescence, something all of us dealt with at one time in our lives. They have no family, only each other, yet as kids how can they survive without adults.

Let the Right One In is a quiet film. The dialog is as sparse as the landscape of Blackeberg. There are some truly frightening scenes, plenty of gore, and a final set piece that now stands as one of the most memorable movie scenes I’ve witnessed. The way that the director, Tomas Alfredson, handles vampiric mythology is smart and plays well with the plot.

The movie is derived from the novel of the same name by John Ajvide Lindqvist

I give Let the Right One In high praise. Not only did it overcome my built-in distrust of anything ‘vampire’, it also proved to be an effective horror story about being a lonely child.


Watching Watchmen, not so bad, after all

I’ve known Justin Stewart for a long time. I’m guessing close to ten years. To me, he’s the arbiter of ‘cool.’ He is the only person I know who can wear a pink t-shirt bearing an image of unicorns making…love…and be considered cool for it. So, it was to my detriment that I ignored Justin’s cries for me to read the Watchmen graphic novel over the past decade.

Fair warning–if you haven’t read Watchmen, then read no further. Spoilers abound!

On a personal scale of one to five, one equaling any entry in the Left Behind series and five equaling a genre classic such as The Yiddish Policeman’s Union, I give the Watchmen graphic novel a solid four.

Perhaps this causes you to cry out in accusatory blasphemy. How can I not give the seminal graphic comic work of all time a five? Watchmen has been called the best graphic novel of all time by Justin Stewart (and many other well-versed comic geeks). It won a Hugo. It’s on the Time list of 100 best novels of the twentieth century. When a book earns that much critical praise, it usually deserves it. Part of me agrees with all this. The intricate plotting, the deep characterizations, and the eye-catching artwork and panel design are all exceptional. Rorschach is one of literature’s great anti-heroes. The narrative tension is unmatched.

But…certain aspects of the novel didn’t gel for me. Most importantly, the comic-within-a-comic story, Tales of the Black Freighter, bored me senseless. I realize its allegorical implications, but here’s a situation of art over form really drowning the genius of the main plot arc. I’d argue here that maybe it’s just too much. There are times when a work gets bogged down in its own cleverness, and I’m afraid Tales of the Black Freighter being included in Watchmen felt like one of these times for me.

Secondly, the giant, genetically-created squid that Adrian Veidt uses to destroy New York is just plain hokie. Even as a science fiction fanboy who enjoys his mutated monsters, the creation and execution of Veidt’s masterplan lost a bit of impact due to this contrived and forced science fiction (or one could argue ‘comic book’) element.

Third, the newsstand bits, or as I like to call them–The Funny Papers: Life on the Streets–did little to enhance the novel’s experience. All the commentary made by these scenes were done so better in the other parallel plot threads.

I found the movie to be superior to the graphic novel. I’ve not been able to reconcile the critical dislike with what I saw on the screen. I easily give the movie version of Watchmen a strong four, teetering to a low five.

Director Zack Snyder excised the three main problems I had with the novel and produced an astounding and smart action movie. The movie isn’t without flaws (the handling of Bubastis, heavy-handed action scene editing, weak performance by Matthew Goode), but much of the critics pans were things that didn’t bother me. Manhattan’s big blue penis wasn’t a giant distraction. In fact, I hardly noticed it (I swear!). The Nite Owl/Silk Spectre II sex scene in Archie didn’t seem odd or forced to me. Rorschach’s narration was on the money and helped make some sense of the dense plot.

This is one of the few times I can remember where I enjoyed the movie version of the book better than the book. Anyone else have the same conclusion? Or am I a regular ol’ Walter Kovacs…a complete anti-social freak who just doesn’t fit in with society?

Don’t answer that.


Flood by Stephen Baxter

The clock is ticking down to the End Times, people. Gather up your family, your pets, a stash of food and water, because when the reckoning comes, you need to be ready.

What shape will the reckoning take? There are many options: nano-virus, swine flu, global warming, zombie outbreak, alien invasion, Cthulu, and others. Stephen Baxter decides to postulate our potential end via an old-fashioned flood. And if Noah thought the flood that hit him back in Biblical times was a ‘big deal’, then he should get a load of the rising waters in Baxter’s Flood.

Flood hooks the reader with a strong opening sequence that introduces and ties all the major players in one action packed set piece. Our protagonists have been hostages at the hands of a militant religious fundamentlist group for five years. An entreprising, wealthy man stages a successful rescue that frees the hostages and brings them (and the reader) into a world in the beginning stages of death by water.

The book focuses on this core of characters as they struggle to deal with the disasters created by the flood. It quickly becomes apparent the water is not going to stop rising and humanity will be pressed close to the point of extinction. Baxter masterfully lets this sense of impending doom seep into the story. There are no last-minute heroics here. Just people dealing with the situation and dying as they’re pushed higher and higher while dry land grows more sparse.

The book is clinical in its detailing of the stages of the flood. These parts are fascinating and frightening. Unfortunately, Baxter keeps us at too far a distance from the effects of the disaster on humankind for the reader to feel true horror, as the plot stays near the hostage survivors who are always cordoned off safely with their wealthy savior. There are also massive time jumps that jerks you out of the current situation and places you ten, fifteen years later with introductions to new characters and settings that make you want to scan through the pages to meet back with the characters you care about. Unfortunately, Baxter has made a decision to skimp on the character development in service of the plot, and I feel it weakens the impact of the book.

Overall, this is a nice work of dark science fiction. I’d recommend it to science fiction readers in a heartbeat.


An Asshat and a New Fan

This past Saturday, a young lady who goes by the stage name of Lana Del Rey had a pair of terrible performances on Saturday Night Live. The two songs that she sang, “Video Games” and “Blue Jeans” are soulful, moody pieces that require quite a vocal range. She was off-tune and stiff, quite visibly nervous. To make matters worse, it seemed her backing band refused to slow down or speed up or do anything to help their lead singer during the second song (“Blue Jeans”).

Here is one of the poor performances.

Then the internet exploded.

People who have no platform to criticize ripped into Lana Del Ray. An actress named Juliette Lewis… someone who was relevant maybe fifteen years ago in the film industry and has struggled to gain any traction in her musical “career” had a few things to say. Asshats on Twitter and commenters on entertainment sites decided to say things like “Rather watch Ashlee Simpson pretend to sing live than this two-bit ditch pig open her mouth.”

I decided to look into Lana Del Rey’s work. She’s basically a YouTube sensation who has an amazing publicist that got her a gig on SNL. Or she is rich and has rich friends (as I’ve seen remarked here and there). That’s a double whammy of schadenfreude fuel.

Have you listened to her songs on YouTube? They’re quite awesome. I’d call her music a cross-pollination of early Tori Amos and the husky soul of Adele. Perhaps the experienced hand of a music producer polished her work (in the book business that job is called ‘editor’). There is a reason she was on SNL. I’m just surprised Lorne Michael had her on since she’s yet to release a full length album and has very few live performances under her belt.

So I’d like to thank the asshat who called Lana Del Rey a two-bit ditch pig. Your anonymous and brave insult encouraged me to take a minute to research her music a bit more, and now Lana Del Rey can count me as a new fan. Stay classy, bro.

I leave you with the official version of ‘Blue Jeans’.


The Failure of Fallout: New Vegas

Despite being a book publisher, I land firmly on the side that video games are a form of art, in the same mold of other forms of visual media such as movies, television, and music videos. Except that video games are even cooler because they’re interactive.

I would venture that making a game that is as interesting and entertaining as a movie is more difficult because not only do you have to get the visuals, the script, and the sound just right… but you also have to interface with your audience/user in a fun and interesting way. So when a game like Fallout: New Vegas comes so close to touching that magical place so few other games have, but fails, it turns into a major disappointment.

As a point of reference, my list of video games that exemplify the best the medium has to offer is quite short (and no doubt leaves off many great games due to my own limited playing experiences). Doom, Half-Life 1 and Half-Life 2, Bioshock, Dead Space 2, Final Fantasy VII, Super Mario Bros. 3, Resident Evil 4, Baldur’s Gate, and Fallout 3.

Make special note of that last one. Fallout 3. Here. Watch the first promo for Fallout 3 and tell me that you’re not ready to jump right in and start playing.

This is a genius of a trailer… but that’s fodder for a different blog post…

So here’s the trailer for Fallout: New Vegas.

It’s good stuff, but it lacks the emotional punch of the trailer for Fallout 3. In fact, practically ALL aspects of Fallout: New Vegas lacks the emotional punch of its predecessor. In Fallout 3, the main story involves your father and a terrible betrayal. You visit national institutions that are now in ruins.  The whole thing is quite harrowing. In Fallout: New Vegas, you’re an anonymous courier who can side with robots (or Vegas assholes, or a power hungry army, or Caesar’s Legions–the name should tell you plenty about them) to take over New Vegas. The scenes of desolation involve the desert and New Vegas. Not quite the same impact. The closest I came to caring about ANYTHING in Fallout: New Vegas was a poor robo-dog that needed a new brain or else it would die of old age.

To be sure, both games are gorgeous. I actually found the acting to be good in both (and who doesn’t love Ron Perlman as a narrator?). Game play is solid FPS business. Yet, after the novelty of a new Fallout experience expired, the whole game felt like a chore, a test to see how many “Boy, go and fetch me this and that” missions I would undergo.

To exacerbate the problem with the game, F:NV suffers from being too damn easy. F3 was quite a challenge. F:NV, once your character reaches level 25 or so, has a powerful rifle, and two companions, you’re quite unstoppable. I took out an entire camp of nasty Caesar Legion soliders  (about 40 of the toughest dudes in the game, including Caesar and all his bodyguards) all on my own. My battle with the “big boss” at the end of the game lasted all of three head shots with my rifle. Grand Theft Auto IV doesn’t make my list of greatest games because it is too difficult (I’m only a semi-casual gamer). F:NV doesn’t make my list partially because it is too easy.

So close… F:NV is a painful ‘what if’ in the canon of video games.


January – Who Am I?

Once a month, I’m going to try and do these “About me” type posts to give new readers and old alike a quick rundown of who I am.

I am not someone of any particular importance. On a scale of Unknown to President Obama, I rank right around “Who the hell is that?”

I run a publishing company called Apex Publications (http://www.apexbookcompany.com). Apex produces books of science fiction, fantasy, and horror. I also operate Apex Magazine (http://www.apex-magazine.com), a monthly e-zine of science fiction, fantasy, and horror short fiction.

You might say I like science fiction, fantasy, and horror. Just a bit.

I also freelance edit, be it copy, line, or content edits. About once a year, I get worked up enough to edit an anthology. My latest is The Zombie Feed, Volume 1 that hasn’t sold well enough to warrant a second edition. This makes me sad. It’s a great book. I hope you’ll consider buying a copy from Apex in print or digital form (the linked page contains direct links to places like Amazon and B&N if you prefer to shop there).

I also write short fiction. I call myself a writer even though I’ve not written anything new or sold anything in nearly a year. I’ve had about 40 stories published, mostly semi-pro zines and anthologies.  The very latest story is one I’m quite proud of called “Useless Creek.” Here’s a bibliography.

Finally, I wrap all this work around an 8-5 day job where I work as a software developer (doing SAP ABAP, specifically).

I’m extremely private about family stuff. When you reject thousands of writers a year, I feel it is best to keep the really important stuff close to your vest.

Got questions? Check out my Formspring profile and ask away.

Cheers!


Aloha from Hell by Richard Kadrey

Blasphemy. It’s all the rage. I blame the Republicans, and specifically, those types running for office. The double election of George W. Bush has them all thinking that thumping the Bible will get them elected. Meh, whatever.

Richard Kadrey’s Aloha from Hell is full of blasphemy and good old fashioned violence. But all the violence is directed at human scumbags, hellions, and demons, so it’s all non-offensive. The good kind of violence that lets you grow excited by the action without the guilt. The book is also full of entertaining neo-noir quips and a rock-solid hero born of the frothy mix of Sam Spade and Harry Dresden.

Briefly, to get you up to speed, Aloha from Hell is the third book in the Sandman Slim series. The first, Sandman Slim, focused on a guy named James Stark and the events after his escape from living ‘downtown’ (hell) for eleven years. During that time, he became a bit of a legend in the underworld for his fighting prowess and bad ass nature. We find out that a magician named Mason sent Stark to hell… alive, via a summoned portal. And he killed Alice, Stark’s girlfriend. Stark gets revenge on most everyone involved, makes a handful of friends, and goes on trying to live the life of a monster who kills monsters.

The second book, Kill the Dead, is an odd middle act. It is odd because it isn’t a traditional book two of three. It’s almost a stand alone story about Stark being hired by Lucifer as his bodyguard. Homeland Security works with a rogue angel to raise the dead to end the world, and this keeps Stark occupied while he tries to keep an eye on his employer. Kadrey does a good job setting up the pieces for book three.

Aloha from Hell picks up two months after book two. Stark and his cast of friends is hired to find a demon-possessed kid. It’s all a ploy by the big meanie from the first book, Mason, to draw Stark back to hell and play a role in the destruction of heaven and hell. Where are the big bosses, God and Lucifer? Lucifer has abdicated leadership of hell and returned to heaven. God… well… he’s around and mostly ambivalent. Stark saves the day/universe, and we’re given a nice happy ending with a bow on top (although the denouement with Stark and Alice is a bit sad).

I ‘read’ the audio version of Aloha from Hell and thoroughly enjoyed the narration by MacLeod Andrews.

Aloha from Hell is a fun book that is sloppily written. Stark is an amazing character who has amazing things happen to him, but inexplicably he’s pulled out of the fire time and time again. To enjoy the book, the reader simply has to roll with the punches. I’ll give you a couple of examples. Nobody in the history of time has escaped Tartarus (a place where the dead-dead’s souls go and is fed into a furnace so they’re really dead, dead-dead-dead), yet Stark drops down there, finds the one soul among millions he went to retrieve, in mere seconds figures out a way to not only escape Tartarus, but to open portals to heaven, hell, and earth.

Really?

Much is made of Stark’s black blade. Crafted with the bones of hellions, it cuts through anything. It opens locks. Starts cars. And when used in a lethal manner, you’re dead-dead, with no hope of coming back, no matter if you’re a mortal or spiritual being.  Stark is practically gutted by Mason’s black blade. He even dies. But hold on, he comes back! Behold, Lucifer has placed a soul-catcher in Stark’s heart (placed there without explanation in the second book) that catches it before it darts off to Tartarus.

Wow, lucky for Stark, eh?

I complain, but when you get right down to it, if Kadrey wrote another Sandman Slim novel, I’d jump in line and buy a copy (the audio version, please). These are entertaining books. So what if the author plays loose and dangerous with his own rules, its his damn universe and his damn world. And Sandman Slim is one damned soul who is fun to follow.


The Art of Narrative Momentum

They say to be a good writer, you need to be a good reader. Until recently, it never occurred to me that this should include both fiction and nonfiction (excepting for the better books on writing). Many of you are probably saying “Duh”… but writers hear me out, because Moneyball by Michael Lewis provides a great study in something I think of as ‘narrative momentum’, an important facet to writing a compelling story.

Moneyball is a book published in 2003 about Oakland A’s general manager Billy Beane and his use of sabermetrics (a form of statistical analysis) to determine a player’s batting effectiveness. At the time, the use of sabermetrics was quite revolutionary. If there is any institution stuck in its traditions and the thought structure of “well, it’s how we’ve always done it” mentality, it’s the game of baseball. The baseball purist will generally be proud of this blinders-to-the-real world thinking… or used to be. Billy Beane and his assistant Paul DePodesta built a mathematical system to predict how many wins a team would have based on the players on its team versus the team’s opponents. This allowed Beane and DePodesta to select quality players nobody else wanted at bargain prices. Because Oakland maintained the third lowest payroll (something around $45,000,000 a year) in the major leagues, finding quality bargain players was necessary in order to compete for a championship.

So Bean and DePodesta built a team their computer estimated would win 95 games. The A’s went on to win 103 games and place first the toughest division in baseball (though they ended up losing in the first round of the playoffs). Along the way, they won an American league record 20 games in a row.

This story doesn’t sound terribly exciting for anybody but mathematicians and baseball general managers. Perhaps throwing Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill into the mix amps up the interest for the masses (and me)… plus, I saw an interesting interview with the author on the Jon Stewart show, so I decided to read the book.

While the book focuses on Beane, his draft day antics, his hysterical tantrums, the dismay and disbelief of his staff and players, he isn’t the driving force behind the book. No, the driving force is the story of a little known player named Scott Hatteberg.

Michael Lewis

Michael Lewis builds the heart of his narrative around Hatteberg, a likable and congenial guy, beginning with his waning days as a Boston Red Sox catcher. Hatteberg was injured in a manner that meant he could never play the position of catcher again. He’d always played catcher. Going as far back as his little league team. Lewis gives the reader a bit of background about Hatteberg’s life, playing catcher, the positive role baseball played in his life. The Red Sox let Hatteberg go, even though he was an effective hitter.

Billy Beane offered Hatteberg a contract with one caveat–Hatteberg would have to play first base because Oakland needed to use someone else in the DH position. Lewis gives us scenes of the player and his wife and child hitting him ground balls in the rain in their backyard. His coaches tell us cringeworthy stories about Scott and his inability to play first base in game situations.

Through all this, Michael Lewis has been generating reader sympathy for Scott Hatteberg. He’s also been pushing the narrative forward smartly interspersing the larger, less emotional story of Billy Beane and the A’s transformation with that of the underdog first baseman.

The book reaches its climax when the A’s are playing the hapless Royals. They have won 19 games straight, tying the record. Lewis slows down time, giving us a near inning by inning breakdown. The A’s jump out to a large lead… 11 to 0, with their ace pitcher on the mound. The record looks in the bag. Then the unthinkable happens. The Royals mount an incredible rally. The A’s go from ecstatic record breakers to the gang of losers the league still believes them to be. The Royals tie the game and send it into extra innings, tied 11 apiece.

The manager, disliking Billy Beane’s strategy, had decided to sit Scott Hatteberg in favor of a more preferred player. So Scott had spent most of the game in the players clubhouse drinking coffee rooting for his team. The manager calls on Hatteberg to pinch hit. He has to hurry to prepare, even grabbing the wrong bat (most players in the big leagues sign with Louisville Slugger to use specially designed bats for their exclusive use).

Hatteberg, with two strikes, blasts a walkoff pinch hit homerun. The A’s go wild. And good ol’ Hatteberg, the player nobody wanted, the player other made fun of at first base, the player even the manager didn’t want, saves the day and gives the A’s the record.

Win one for the little guys, right?

In the book’s denounement, we’re told Hatteberg went on to become well-regarded for his fielding skills at first base, that the A’s won 103 games, and before long just about every team hired a sabermetrics expert.

As an editor, I recommend that a great way to engage the reader is to keep your story surging forward, usually on the back of a sympathetic character. Being nonfiction, Michael Lewis had a real-life one tailor made in Scott Hatteberg. Naturally, writing and being successful in creating narrative momentum is easier said than done. Sometimes you need to read a good book to get a handle on certain arts of the craft of writing. And sometimes, you’re given examples of craft in the most unexpected of stories.


Things that happened

The year 2011 has come and went, and it seems that the general consensus is “good riddance” to it. I can’t say I disagree, it wasn’t the best of times, though it wasn’t the worst of times (talking on a personal level, of course).

On the positive side…

They Might Be Giants released a new album (that wasn’t targeted for kids) called “Join Us“. It’s got some memorable, catchy tunes with plenty of TMBG wackiness interspersed. My favorites include “Can’t Keep Johnny Down”, “Cloisonné”, “Never Knew Love”, and “When Will You Die.”

The guys at Midnight Syndicate released the best album of their rather distinguished career.  That album, “Carnival Arcane“, uses the familiar backdrop of a mysterious circus and the creepy stuff that happens behind the tent walls. Favorites include “Mesonoxian Visitors” (an amazing piece that sets the tone of this themed album wonderfully), “Welcome to the Carnival”, “Dr. Atmore’s Elixirs of Good Humour and Fortification”, “Arcane Wonders”, “Pulling the Strings”, and “Freakshow” (a haunting, melodic piano work that is the best new song I hear in 2011).

Most of my reading has an alien head on the spine, so I don’t get to read 100 new books a year like I want. I did plow through a lot of material, though. My favorite book this year was Sleepless by Charlie Huston.  It was released on December 28th, 2010, so I’m counting this as a 2011 title. This is his first foray into science fiction (he’s written an outstanding supernatural-noir vampire series you should check out, search for Joe Pitt) and he, being Charlie Huston, naturally knocks it out of the park. The story revolves around good cop and a real nasty (yet erudite and urbane) assassin in a Los Angeles on the verge of collapse. A disease that causes permanent insomnia has struck the population and there is no cure in sight. The only hope for those with the disease is relief in the drug called “DR33M3R”. The cop is assigned to discover who is behind the black market for “DR33M3R”. The assassin is sent on a mission to recover a stolen data chip. The two story threads collide and by the end of the book the reader is left entertained, morose, and wishing Mr. Huston would hurry up writing his next novel.

Here’s a five minute snippet:

I read the Steve Jobs biography by Walter Isaacson (called, simply, Steve Jobs). I’ve had several people complain to me that they felt the book was dictated by Jobs to the author in a manner to make Jobs and Apple seem godlike. I never got that impression. If anything, Isaacson was too dry in his workman like outline of Jobs remarkable life. The best parts of the books were the directly transcribed memories by Jobs of his adventures. Fairly thorough, you will get a great picture of Jobs the man, and at least a partial idea of why he behaved as he did. The book does talk about the pancreatic cancer that took his life. Ends with it, actually, and I found myself hoping for a happy ending that I knew was not coming.

I read two other books of note in 2011. One was The Heroes by Joe Abercrombie. The man writes fantasy action movies on the page. In what is some of the best fantasy writing I’ve read, Abercrombie takes the reader into the heart of battle, transitioning the point of view from character to character as they die. It’s a crazy entertaining ride. The Heroes is part of Abercrombie’s Book of Law universe, though you can enjoy it without having read any of the other works.

The second book was an older title that a movie prompted me to read: Moneyball by Michael Lewis. By now, most people probably know the story. Oakland A’s general manager Billy Beane uses statistical analysis (sabermetrics) to push the small market team to the top of baseball (nearly the top, they lost in the playoffs, though they did win the toughest  division and 104 games). The most interesting part of the book is how Michael Lewis uses narrative momentum (centered around the transformation of player Scott Hatteburg) to turn a nonfiction story into page-turning excitement that culminates with the A’s record-breaking 20 game winning streak.

Community, my favorite television show, was put on hiatus. I’m still pissed about it. Justified had a great year with Margo Martindale providing the best acting I’ve seen on television in a long time. Revenge is my favorite new show from 2011 (love some Emily VanCamp). The Walking Dead mostly bored me, then nearly made me cry in the season finale. I found American Horror Story to be ridiculous and had a hard time watching the whole season (but damn, can Connie Britton and Zachary Quinto act!).

That’s enough recapping. I need to go finish my “Save Community” diorama!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,728 other followers